- Comparisons
- One region, or twenty-eight jurisdictions
Comparison
One region, or twenty-eight jurisdictions
A regional bank knows its market better than any outsider will. It also stops at the border, and a client whose interests cross that border is handed to a correspondent whose incentives and standards the bank does not set.
| Aspect | A regional bank | A 28-jurisdiction platform |
|---|---|---|
| Where a client can be booked | In the home jurisdiction of the bank, and elsewhere through correspondents. | In any of 28 jurisdictions of domicile or registration, each with a local entity. |
| Cross-border payments | Through a chain of correspondents the bank does not control and cannot replace quickly. | Through more than 140 correspondent and counterparty relationships across 52 countries. |
| When a corridor closes | Business waits until the correspondent has been replaced and the file re-papered. | The transaction is rebooked through another entity in another region, usually the same week. |
| Local knowledge | Complete at home. Bought from advisers everywhere else. | Offices and representative desks in 36 cities, each staffed by people who live there. |
| Regulatory perimeter | One regime, understood completely, with everything outside it treated as an exception. | 28 regimes, a published notice for each, and a perimeter policy governing what is offered where. |
| Cost of the network | Low, and paid again in fees on every cross-border transaction the client asks for. | High, funded from realised proceeds, and the reason capital can move at all. |
The institution built the network first and the business afterwards. Twenty-eight jurisdictions, thirty-six cities and 312 people are expensive to carry. They are what allows a position to be originated in one region, held in a second and realised into a third without asking anyone for permission.