IGUAKO Capital is a work of institutional fiction by the Iguako Institute for Applied Unreality. No financial services are offered, no accounts exist and nothing here is an offer, a contract or advice.About this work
George Town · 36 cities · English Domiciles Documents Iguako Network Site Index

Regulatory notice · Japan

Japan: Anti-Money Laundering Notice

No mandate begins at IGUAKO Capital until the firm can say who the client is, who stands behind it and where the money came from. This notice sets out the identification the firm carries out, the evidence it requires for the origin of wealth, the monitoring that follows, and the route an internal suspicion takes. It is issued under the group Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing policy, IGC-FC-001, and the Know Your Client and Client Due Diligence policy, IGC-FC-002. The group standard is a floor. Where the local regime asks for more, the local requirement is added to it.

Jurisdiction
Japan
Local entity
IGUAKO Capital Japan K.K.
Served from
Tokyo
Group policy
IGC-FC-001
Reviewed
June 2026

Identification before a mandate opens

Before the first transaction, the Japan entity identifies the client, every natural person who owns or controls 10 per cent or more of it through any chain of holdings, and every person authorised to give instructions. An individual is recorded by full legal name, date of birth, nationality, residential address and each country of tax residence, and each of those is verified from an independent source rather than from the client alone. A company, fund or partnership is recorded by its constitutional documents, its directors or its general partner, and by an ownership chain traced to natural persons or to a listed issuer. The completed file is approved by two officers, one of whom sits outside the desk that introduced the relationship, and a file rated high risk is approved again by the Asia-Pacific regional compliance officer.

Evidence for the source of wealth and the source of funds

The firm asks two questions and requires an answer to both. Source of wealth explains how the client came to hold what it holds: a business sold, an estate inherited, distributions from an operating group, a career of professional income. Source of funds explains how this particular subscription, deposit or facility is being paid. Each answer is corroborated in writing, by sale agreements, audited accounts, filed returns, trust deeds or distribution notices, and never by description alone. Cash is not accepted anywhere in the network. Where an account of the wealth cannot be evidenced, the relationship does not open, and the reason is recorded on the refusal log kept in Tokyo.

The provisions that apply locally

The group standard applies identically in all 28 domiciles. Each jurisdiction then adds what its own regime requires of IGUAKO Capital Japan K.K., of the officers appointed to it and of the reports it has to make.

Japan's anti-money-laundering statute applies to registered financial instruments businesses, and IGUAKO Capital Japan K.K. carries out transaction-time identification of every counterparty and co-investor under it. The statute requires identification of persons who hold 25 per cent or more, and the Tokyo office identifies every holder of 10 per cent under the group standard. Verification of a Japanese corporation includes its registered seal certificate and commercial register extract, obtained directly from the registry rather than from the counterparty. Suspicious transaction reports are filed with the national financial intelligence unit through the regulator, as the statute provides. Foreign politically exposed persons need senior management approval. Records of identification and transactions are kept for seven years, which is both the local and the group standard.

Monitoring output, screening results and internal reports arising on Japan files are held on the group register maintained by the Group Head of Financial Crime, who reports volumes, ageing and outcomes to the Compliance & Conduct Committee each quarter.

Monitoring, internal reporting and records

Every account in the network is monitored automatically each business day against the behaviour the file predicts, and an exception is worked rather than noted. A rating of low, medium or high risk is set at acceptance and drives the refresh cycle, which runs at 12, 24 or 36 months and is tracked centrally. A relationship that falls overdue for refresh is restricted rather than allowed to drift. Any member of staff who forms a suspicion reports it internally the same day, and the money laundering reporting officer appointed for the Japan entity decides whether it goes to the authority that receives such reports locally. The client is not told that a report has been made. Records are kept for seven years after the relationship ends.

The firm would rather decline capital than take capital it cannot explain, and it declines several approaches each year on that ground alone. The decision belongs to compliance and not to the desk that would earn the fee. It is recorded with its reasons, so that the same name is recognised if it returns through another door.

Questions about this notice may be raised with the local entity through compliance@iguako.tech, quoting the jurisdiction and the notice title.