- Compliance
- Regulatory Notices
- Mauritius
- Anti-Money Laundering Notice
Regulatory notice · Mauritius
Mauritius: Anti-Money Laundering Notice
No mandate begins at IGUAKO Capital until the firm can say who the client is, who stands behind it and where the money came from. This notice sets out the identification the firm carries out, the evidence it requires for the origin of wealth, the monitoring that follows, and the route an internal suspicion takes. It is issued under the group Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing policy, IGC-FC-001, and the Know Your Client and Client Due Diligence policy, IGC-FC-002. The group standard is a floor. Where the local regime asks for more, the local requirement is added to it.
Identification before a mandate opens
Before the first transaction, the Mauritius entity identifies the client, every natural person who owns or controls 10 per cent or more of it through any chain of holdings, and every person authorised to give instructions. An individual is recorded by full legal name, date of birth, nationality, residential address and each country of tax residence, and each of those is verified from an independent source rather than from the client alone. A company, fund or partnership is recorded by its constitutional documents, its directors or its general partner, and by an ownership chain traced to natural persons or to a listed issuer. The completed file is approved by two officers, one of whom sits outside the desk that introduced the relationship, and a file rated high risk is approved again by the Africa & Indian Ocean regional compliance officer.
Evidence for the source of wealth and the source of funds
The firm asks two questions and requires an answer to both. Source of wealth explains how the client came to hold what it holds: a business sold, an estate inherited, distributions from an operating group, a career of professional income. Source of funds explains how this particular subscription, deposit or facility is being paid. Each answer is corroborated in writing, by sale agreements, audited accounts, filed returns, trust deeds or distribution notices, and never by description alone. Cash is not accepted anywhere in the network. Where an account of the wealth cannot be evidenced, the relationship does not open, and the reason is recorded on the refusal log kept in Port Louis.
The provisions that apply locally
The group standard applies identically in all 28 domiciles. Each jurisdiction then adds what its own regime requires of IGUAKO Africa Holdings Ltd, of the officers appointed to it and of the reports it has to make.
Mauritius applies its anti-money-laundering law to licensed holding companies through the non-bank financial services regulator and through the licensed management company that administers each of them. IGUAKO Africa Holdings Ltd is a reporting person in its own right and has appointed a resident money laundering reporting officer and a deputy, both notified to the regulator. Because the platform holds positions rather than client accounts, due diligence concentrates on the co-investors in each holding company, the sellers of each position and the borrowers under each facility, each traced to natural persons at the group's 10 per cent threshold. Suspicious transactions are reported to the national financial intelligence unit within the statutory period. The management company keeps a parallel set of records in Port Louis, so the regulator sees both.
Monitoring output, screening results and internal reports arising on Mauritius files are held on the group register maintained by the Group Head of Financial Crime, who reports volumes, ageing and outcomes to the Compliance & Conduct Committee each quarter.
Monitoring, internal reporting and records
Every account in the network is monitored automatically each business day against the behaviour the file predicts, and an exception is worked rather than noted. A rating of low, medium or high risk is set at acceptance and drives the refresh cycle, which runs at 12, 24 or 36 months and is tracked centrally. A relationship that falls overdue for refresh is restricted rather than allowed to drift. Any member of staff who forms a suspicion reports it internally the same day, and the money laundering reporting officer appointed for the Mauritius entity decides whether it goes to the authority that receives such reports locally. The client is not told that a report has been made. Records are kept for seven years after the relationship ends.
The firm would rather decline capital than take capital it cannot explain, and it declines several approaches each year on that ground alone. The decision belongs to compliance and not to the desk that would earn the fee. It is recorded with its reasons, so that the same name is recognised if it returns through another door.
Questions about this notice may be raised with the local entity through compliance@iguako.tech, quoting the jurisdiction and the notice title.
This jurisdiction
Other notices for Mauritius.
This notice elsewhere